The January 2026 United States Economic Report describes an economy entering 2026 with strong but unsustainable momentum, driven by an artificial intelligence investment boom, tariff‑distorted trade flows, and resilient consumption among high‑income households. Real GDP grew an estimated 4.3% in Q4 2025 and around 2% for 2025 overall, yet major institutions project slower 2026 growth between 1.5% and 2.4%, reflecting deep uncertainty over trade policy, inflation, and fiscal paths. A multi‑indicator dashboard shows robust productivity and real wage gains but weakening consumer confidence, capacity utilization, and business sentiment, highlighting a bifurcated economy where financial markets and output metrics appear healthier than household perceptions.
Inflation has stalled near 2.7%, with core measures above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target despite moderating wage growth. Productivity has surged above 4% for two consecutive quarters, easing unit labor costs and supporting profits, but it is unclear whether this reflects a lasting AI‑driven shift or temporary volatility. Labor markets show late‑cycle softening—slower job creation and slightly higher unemployment—yet remain relatively tight because immigration restrictions have sharply reduced labor supply, raising the risk of renewed wage‑price pressures.
Policy forces pull in conflicting directions. Elevated interest rates and tighter credit continue to weigh on housing, investment, and interest‑sensitive spending, even as stock prices and valuations remain high. At the same time, fiscal deficits near 6–7% of GDP and federal debt around 125% of GDP create mounting debt‑sustainability risks and limit future crisis response capacity. Tariffs temporarily boosted growth and revenue by shrinking the trade deficit, but they also raised prices and threaten long‑term competitiveness. Baseline projections foresee growth slowing to roughly 2.1% in 2026 with modest downside risks, while scenarios range from a productivity‑led soft landing to a tariff‑ and inflation‑driven downturn if policy or external shocks break adversely.
United States Economic Report January 2026
Table Of Contents
Executive Summary
The United States economy enters 2026 with remarkably resilient momentum, expanding at an estimated 4.3% annualized rate in Q4 2025—the strongest quarterly performance in two years—yet faces a complex macroeconomic crossroads as multiple forces converge to shape the trajectory ahead.
Quarter-over-quarter growth accelerated from 3.8% in Q3 to this elevated pace, tracking toward full-year 2025 expansion of approximately 2.0%, though 2026 forecasts diverge substantially between 1.5% (OECD) and 2.4% (IMF), reflecting profound uncertainty surrounding policy implementation, particularly the Supreme Court’s pending review of tariff legality and fiscal expansion dynamics.
Three primary drivers dominate the current landscape: an unprecedented artificial intelligence investment boom adding nearly 2 percentage points to GDP through data center and semiconductor infrastructure buildout; tariff-induced supply chain reconfiguration that paradoxically boosted net exports by 1.97 percentage points in Q4 as firms front-loaded shipments; and consumption resilience sustained by the top 20% of earners who account for 57% of consumer outlays despite deteriorating sentiment among middle-income households.
Critical downside risks center on potential inflation resurgence above 4% by year-end 2026 driven by lagged tariff pass-through and fiscal deficits potentially exceeding 7% of GDP, labor market tightening as reduced immigration lowers breakeven employment to 90,000 monthly additions from 150,000 previously, and debt sustainability concerns with federal obligations reaching 125% of GDP amid $1 trillion annual interest payments. The outlook points to moderating but positive growth through Q2 2026 at 2.0-2.5% with 65% confidence, absent external shocks or Supreme Court invalidation of current trade policy architecture, positioning the economy in late-cycle expansion territory where forward indicators signal deceleration while backward-looking employment and financial market data mask emerging vulnerabilities. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
Economic Dashboard: Multi-Indicator Assessment
US Economic Indicator Dashboard for Q4 2025 showing normalized performance across 10 key metrics. The larger current-period polygon (blue) compared to year-ago (gray) indicates stronger productivity and real wage growth, offset by weaker consumer confidence and capacity utilization.
The economic dashboard reveals pronounced asymmetry across indicators, exposing a bifurcated economy where financial assets and productivity gains diverge sharply from deteriorating consumer psychology and utilization slack.
The current-period polygon contracts meaningfully from year-ago levels in consumer confidence, capacity utilization, and business sentiment, yet expands dramatically in productivity growth and real wage dynamics—a pattern characteristic of technology-driven productivity accelerations that boost output per worker while displacing labor demand and unsettling households about future employment security.
Growth and Output Indicators
Output indicators paint a deceptively robust near-term picture masking underlying deceleration. Real GDP expanded 4.3% annualized in Q3 2025, the most vigorous quarterly performance since Q2 2023, driven predominantly by a 3.5% surge in personal consumption expenditures and a dramatic reversal in net export contributions from -0.30% to +1.97% as tariff front-loading accelerated import substitution. The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model nowcasted Q4 2025 growth at an extraordinary 5.4% as of January 8, substantially above consensus forecasts of 3.0-3.3%, though this estimate incorporates methodological revisions to trade accounting and likely overstates sustainable momentum. Industrial production rose 2.78% year-over-year through November 2025, with manufacturing output increasing 0.2% month-over-month in December, yet the annualized Q4 growth rate for manufacturing contracted -0.7%, revealing sectoral fragmentation where aerospace normalization following Boeing strike resolution (+33%) and automotive production (+30%) masked sustained weakness in machinery and primary metals. Retail sales surged 1.26% month-over-month in December and 3.54% year-over-year, culminating in holiday season spending growth of 4.1% that exceeded the National Retail Federation’s pre-season forecast range upper bound, though this acceleration reflects calendar effects (Cyber Monday’s December 1 timing) rather than fundamental demand strengthening. Housing starts spiked 15.8% to a 1.499 million annual rate in December after November’s collapse, yet remain 4.4% below year-ago levels, with single-family construction at 1.05 million units indicating stabilization near long-term averages rather than robust expansion. [1] [2] [3] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
Prices, Wages, and Income Dynamics
Disinflation progress has stalled conspicuously, with critical implications for Federal Reserve policy flexibility. Consumer Price Index inflation remained anchored at 2.7% year-over-year in December 2025, unchanged from November despite expectations of moderation to 2.6%, while the monthly increase accelerated to 0.3% from 0.1%, driven by shelter inflation (+0.4%), food price surges (+0.7%), and energy cost increases (+0.3%). Core inflation—excluding volatile food and energy components—held at 2.7% annually and rose 0.2% monthly, persistently above the Federal Reserve’s 2.0% target and matching core Personal Consumption Expenditures inflation of 2.8% that directly informs monetary policy deliberations. This inflation persistence occurs despite nominal wage growth decelerating from 5.01% year-over-year in September to 3.8% in December, creating a favorable 1.1 percentage point real wage growth differential that benefits 57% of workers but leaves 43% falling behind price increases—a distributional dynamic that helps explain paradoxical consumer confidence deterioration amid low unemployment. Real wage growth measured by weekly earnings rose just 0.92% annually or $12 per week in inflation-adjusted terms, insufficient to restore purchasing power erosion experienced during 2022-2023’s inflationary surge when real wages contracted substantially for 18 consecutive months. Productivity growth, however, presents the economy’s most encouraging signal: labor productivity soared 4.9% annualized in Q3 2025, the strongest pace in two years, following an upwardly revised 4.1% Q2 increase, marking the first back-to-back quarters exceeding 4.0% since 2020-2021’s pandemic recovery. Unit labor costs—the wage bill per unit of output—declined 1.9% in Q3, the first consecutive quarterly decreases since 2019, substantially easing inflationary pressures from compensation while enabling margin expansion. [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22]
Labor Markets, Sentiment, and Financial Conditions
Labor markets exhibit late-cycle characteristics: gradual loosening from pandemic-era extremes without triggering recession-level deterioration. The unemployment rate ended 2025 at 4.4%, up 0.4 percentage points from January’s 4.0% but down from November’s initially reported 4.6% (later revised to 4.5%), remaining well below the 5.7% historical average yet crossing thresholds associated with labor market cooling. December payroll growth totaled just 50,000, extending a pronounced deceleration: the economy added an average of 20,000 private-sector jobs monthly in Q4 2025 (ADP data), representing a 90% collapse from Q4 2024’s 200,000 monthly pace. Critically, reduced immigration has lowered the breakeven employment level—monthly job gains needed to maintain stable unemployment—from approximately 150,000 in early 2024 to below 90,000 by mid-2025, meaning the labor market remains tighter than headline unemployment suggests despite hiring slowdowns. The labor force participation rate edged down to 62.4% in December, while jobless claims fell to two-year lows, indicating limited firing pressure even as new hiring stalls. Yet consumer sentiment tells a dramatically different story: the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index plunged to 89.1 in December, down 3.8 points from November’s revised 92.9, marking the fifth consecutive monthly decline. The Expectations Index—measuring short-term outlook for income, business conditions, and employment—remained at 70.7, below the 80 threshold historically signaling recession risk for the eleventh straight month. This confidence deterioration occurs despite objective labor market stability, suggesting psychological scarring from inflation experiences and forward-looking concerns about job security and wage trajectory. Manufacturing sentiment similarly deteriorated: the ISM Manufacturing PMI contracted to 47.9 in December, below the 50 expansion threshold, even as the S&P Global Manufacturing PMI held at 51.8, the fifth consecutive month above 50—a divergence reflecting differences in sample composition and weighting methodologies. [16] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [6]
Financial conditions remain broadly accommodative despite monetary policy tightening cycles. The S&P 500 rose 17.9% including dividends in 2025, its third consecutive year of double-digit gains, bringing the bull market’s total return to 100.6% since October 2022. Equity valuations reached elevated levels with forward price-to-earnings ratios near historical peaks, though Goldman Sachs projects a more modest 12% total return in 2026 as earnings growth normalizes and multiple expansion exhausts. The 10-year Treasury yield oscillated between 4.24% and 4.30% in mid-January 2026, approximately 70 basis points above October 2025 lows but 35 basis points below January 2025 highs, while the yield curve normalized substantially with the 10-year minus 2-year spread widening to +0.66%, reversing the inversion that persisted through mid-2025. Credit spreads widened moderately but remain compressed by historical standards, corporate borrowing costs stayed elevated at levels incompatible with historical investment cycles, and mortgage rates remained 220 basis points above 2021 levels despite Federal Reserve easing. Capacity utilization rose marginally to 76.3% in December from 76.1% in November yet remained 3.2 percentage points below its 1972-2024 long-run average, with manufacturing utilization unchanged at 75.6%, signaling substantial productive slack despite GDP growth acceleration—a pattern suggesting output gains reflect productivity enhancement rather than capacity expansion. [2] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38]
Cross-Validation and Divergence Reconciliation
These patterns reveal an economy in transition from late-expansion to early-deceleration phases. Lagging indicators—unemployment levels, stock market valuations, inflation rates—reflect past economic strength and policy accommodation, while leading indicators—PMI surveys, consumer expectations, credit spreads, yield curve normalization—signal future moderation. Coincident data such as retail sales and industrial production show present deceleration masked by temporary factors including tariff-induced trade timing distortions, calendar effects in holiday spending, and Boeing strike resolution. The 3-6 month temporal lag structure suggests growth weakness intensifying through Q2 2026 as forward-looking indicators’ warnings manifest in hard data, while labor markets likely remain resilient until Q3 2026 given employment’s characteristic delayed response to demand shocks. The productivity surge provides the economy’s primary buffer: if sustained, 4%+ productivity growth enables 2%+ GDP expansion with minimal employment gains, containing wage pressures and inflation risks while justifying elevated equity valuations through improved profit margins. However, productivity accelerations historically prove difficult to sustain beyond two-three quarter intervals, and reversion toward 1.5-2.0% trend rates would expose underlying demand fragility masked by current efficiency gains.
GDP Analysis & Forecast
US Real GDP historical trajectory and forecast showing robust Q4 2025 performance (estimated 4.3%) with projected moderation to 2.0-2.5% growth in 2026. Widening confidence intervals reflect uncertainty from tariff policy, fiscal trajectory, and labor market dynamics.
Historical Context: Five-Year Trajectory
Over the past five years, the United States achieved 2.1% average annual GDP growth—modestly below its pre-pandemic 2.4% trend—navigating through unprecedented volatility that included a sharp pandemic-induced contraction, robust fiscal-stimulus-fueled recovery, inflation-fighting monetary tightening, and tariff-regime transitions. The 2020 pandemic recession (-4.3% contraction) gave way to extraordinary 2021 recovery (5.8% expansion) as pent-up demand, supply chain normalization, and $5 trillion federal fiscal stimulus converged. Growth decelerated through 2022-2023 (averaging 2.1%) as the Federal Reserve executed its most aggressive tightening cycle in four decades, raising rates 525 basis points to combat inflation that peaked at 9.1% in June 2022. The economy proved remarkably resilient through 2024-2025, defying recession forecasts as consumption held firm, employment remained strong, and productivity gains emerged, bringing the current cycle to its 15th quarter of expansion since October 2022’s trough. [2] [3] [39]
Current Quarter Decomposition: Q4 2025 GDP Components
Q4 2025’s estimated 4.3% year-over-year growth—substantially exceeding the Federal Reserve’s 2.3% 2026 projection and consensus expectations—comprised profoundly uneven contributions reflecting policy distortions and sectoral divergences. Personal consumption expenditures contributed 1.7 percentage points, accounting for 40% of expansion, as labor income growth of 3.8% and accumulated savings supported spending despite consumer confidence deterioration and inflation concerns. Business fixed investment added 1.1 percentage points, rebounding from earlier weakness, with equipment spending surging 8.1% year-over-year and intellectual property investment—predominantly software and AI infrastructure—jumping 12.2% as firms accelerated digital transformation and data center construction. Government spending contributed 0.5 percentage points through infrastructure investment and defense procurement, while residential investment subtracted 0.1 points as housing activity remained suppressed by elevated mortgage rates despite December’s temporary surge. The most striking component: net exports contributed an extraordinary 1.9 percentage points, reversing typical drag patterns, as export growth of 4.2% outpaced import growth of 3.1%—a dynamic driven entirely by tariff front-loading rather than fundamental competitiveness improvement. This trade contribution is unsustainable; imports surged in Q1 2025 ahead of tariff implementation then collapsed 39% by October as duties took effect, creating a $29.4 billion monthly deficit (smallest since June 2009) that artificially boosted Q4 GDP but masks a $1.26 trillion annual goods deficit exceeding 2024’s $1.21 trillion gap. [16] [2] [3] [39] [11] [40] [41] [42]
Forward Projection: Baseline Scenario and Assumptions
The baseline forecast employs a synthesis methodology combining OECD leading indicators, Federal Reserve Board sectoral momentum indices, Congressional Budget Office fiscal projections, and consensus professional forecasts, with key assumption transparency. GDP growth is projected to moderate substantially: 2.2% in Q1 2026, 2.0% in Q2, 2.1% in Q3, and 2.2% in Q4—averaging 2.1% for full-year 2026, aligning with the IMF’s recently upgraded 2.4% forecast midpoint and substantially above the OECD’s pessimistic 1.5% projection. The 68% confidence interval around Q2 2026 ranges from 1.2% to 2.8%, reflecting elevated policy uncertainty, while by Q4 2026 this interval widens to 0.7%-3.7%, illustrating forecast difficulty over extended horizons. Growth composition shifts materially: consumption contribution moderates to 1.4 percentage points as real wage gains slow and accumulated savings deplete; business investment maintains 1.0 percentage point contribution as AI spending remains elevated but equipment purchases normalize; government spending adds 0.4 points through election-year fiscal accommodation; net exports reverse to subtract -0.7 points as tariff-distorted trade flows rebalance and the strong dollar (despite recent weakness) constrains export competitiveness. [2] [7] [8] [43]
Critical Assumptions and Sensitivity Analysis
The baseline rests on five critical assumptions: (1) Federal Reserve policy rates decline to 3.25% by year-end 2026 from current 3.50-3.75%, representing two additional 25-basis-point cuts beyond the single reduction priced into futures markets; (2) Brent crude oil averages $76/barrel, avoiding supply shocks from Middle East conflicts; (3) no Supreme Court invalidation of IEEPA tariff authority, maintaining current 18.5% effective tariff rates; (4) fiscal deficit reaches 6.5% of GDP including tariff revenue offsets but not exceeding 7% due to Supreme Court review constraints on new spending; (5) immigration policy reduces net migration to 900,000 annually from 2.4 million in 2024, tightening labor supply. Sensitivity analysis reveals profound forecast conditionality. If the Federal Reserve cuts more aggressively, reaching 3.00% by year-end (40% probability scenario), GDP could exceed baseline by 0.4 percentage points through monetary stimulus channels, lifting 2026 growth to 2.5%. Conversely, inflation resurgence above 4%—increasingly likely given lagged tariff pass-through, fiscal expansion, and labor supply constraints—could force Fed rate increases back toward 4.25%, subtracting 0.6 percentage points and lowering 2026 growth to 1.5%. Supreme Court invalidation of IEEPA tariffs (30% probability based on legal expert assessments) would trigger immediate import surge, subtracting 1.2 percentage points in the quarter following ruling as net exports collapse, though consumption gains from lower prices would partially offset within 2-3 quarters. Oil price spikes to $95+ (20% probability given Middle East tensions) would subtract 0.3-0.5 percentage points through inflation channels and real income erosion. Most dramatically, if fiscal deficits exceed 7.5% of GDP through unconstrained election-year spending—a scenario with 25% probability—growth could reach 2.8% in 2026 but at severe cost to 2027-2028 sustainability as interest burden accelerates and crowding-out intensifies. [39] [5] [6] [7] [43] [42]
Forces Shaping the Economy
Economic performance reflects the interplay of four dominant current forces—AI investment transformation, tariff regime reconfiguration, monetary policy transmission lags, and fiscal expansion dynamics—alongside three emerging dynamics with potential to materially reshape trajectories: productivity acceleration sustainability, labor supply constraints from immigration policy, and debt sustainability pressures threatening long-term growth capacity.
Current Driver 1: Artificial Intelligence Investment Boom
An unprecedented capital expenditure wave targeting AI infrastructure dominates near-term growth dynamics, adding an estimated 0.8-1.0 percentage points to 2025 GDP and projected to maintain 0.6-0.8 percentage point contributions through 2026-2027. Business investment in information processing equipment surged 20.4% year-over-year in Q2 2025, while software and cloud infrastructure spending rose 12.2%, reflecting massive data center construction, semiconductor fabrication facility buildout, and enterprise AI adoption across sectors. Deloitte forecasts business fixed investment rising 4.4% in 2025 and maintaining 4.0% growth in 2026, substantially above 2.9% in 2024, driven primarily by AI-related capital formation even as traditional equipment and structures investment remain subdued. The magnitude is substantial: major technology firms collectively announced over $250 billion in AI infrastructure spending for 2025-2026, with hyperscale data centers requiring $1-2 billion investments each and advanced semiconductor fabs demanding $15-20 billion per facility. This investment boom operates through multiple channels: directly boosting GDP via capital goods production and construction employment; indirectly supporting semiconductor, electrical equipment, and industrial real estate sectors; and potentially—though not yet conclusively—enhancing productivity growth that enables faster non-inflationary expansion. The Goldman Sachs 2026 S&P 500 earnings forecast of 12% growth assumes continued AI investment sustains profit margins through productivity enhancement rather than revenue growth alone. Critical questions center on sustainability: AI investment could maintain 2026-2027 momentum if productivity payoffs materialize and justify capital outlays, or could collapse rapidly if returns disappoint, creating significant downside risk given investment’s 18-20% contribution to recent GDP growth. Current data show 4.9% productivity growth in Q3 2025 potentially validates investment thesis, though whether technology adoption translates to economy-wide efficiency gains beyond narrow technology sector applications remains unproven. [32] [22] [7] [40]
Current Driver 2: Tariff Regime Reconfiguration and Trade Flow Distortions.
Trade policy shifts implemented through 2025 fundamentally altered international commerce patterns, creating both temporary GDP arithmetic tailwinds and structural competitiveness challenges with ambiguous net effects. President Trump’s tariff regime—raising effective U.S. import duties from 2.5% to 18.5% through IEEPA authority invocation, Section 232 national security provisions, and targeted country levies—generated $264 billion federal revenue in 2025, up $185 billion from 2024, partially offsetting fiscal deficits. However, trade impacts extend far beyond revenue accounting. Import front-loading ahead of tariff implementation created a $439.8 billion current account deficit in Q1 2025—the largest quarterly gap on record—as firms rushed to secure inventory at lower duty rates. Subsequently, imports collapsed 39% from March to October as tariffs took effect, narrowing the monthly trade deficit to $29.4 billion by October, the smallest since June 2009, artificially boosting Q4 GDP by 1.97 percentage points through net export arithmetic. This dynamic is inherently temporary: the $1.26 trillion projected 2025 annual goods deficit exceeds 2024’s $1.21 trillion despite tariffs, revealing that duties primarily shift timing rather than fundamentally rebalance trade. Critically, the Supreme Court is reviewing IEEPA tariff authority legality with ruling expected by mid-2026; invalidation (30% probability) would eliminate $185 billion annual revenue, force $600 billion fiscal adjustment or tax increases, and trigger renewed import surges subtracting 1.2 percentage points from GDP in subsequent quarters as trade deficits widen. Even if sustained, tariffs impose multiple costs: consumer prices for affected goods rose 2-4% depending on category; supply chain reconfiguration forced manufacturers to absorb transition costs averaging 8-12% of affected procurement; and retaliatory tariffs reduced agricultural and industrial exports to China and Europe by $45 billion annually. The net effect: tariffs boosted 2025 GDP through trade arithmetic while simultaneously raising inflation, reducing real incomes, and undermining long-term export competitiveness—a Faustian bargain where near-term growth comes at medium-term cost. [2] [44] [45] [5] [7] [41] [42]
Current Driver 3: Monetary Policy Transmission Lags and Financial Conditions
Federal Reserve policy operates with 12-18 month transmission lags, meaning 2025’s rate cuts influence 2026-2027 conditions while 2023-2024’s tightening continues constraining current activity. The Fed raised rates 525 basis points from March 2022 to July 2023, reaching 5.25-5.50%, then held this restrictive stance through summer 2024 before cutting 100 basis points across September-December 2024 and another 75 basis points through 2025, bringing current rates to 3.50-3.75%. Multiple channels transmit this monetary stance. Mortgage rates remain 220 basis points above 2021 levels at 6.8% despite Fed easing, suppressing housing transactions (down 18% year-over-year) and residential construction investment (-5% in 2025), while elevated rates reduced housing wealth effects that typically amplify consumption. Corporate credit markets show 65 basis point spread widening since early 2024 as lenders demand higher risk premiums, raising capital costs that deter expansion investment—business lending surveys report net 28% of banks tightened standards, the highest share outside recession periods. Consumer credit conditions tightened symmetrically, with auto loan and credit card rates reaching 8-14%, constraining durable goods purchases for middle- and lower-income households. These channels continue restraining growth through mid-2026 despite ongoing Fed cuts given contractual lags: existing mortgages lock in high rates for years, corporate credit agreements typically run 3-5 years, and consumer debt refinancing occurs gradually. The Fed’s December 2025 “dot plot” projects only one additional 25-basis-point cut in 2026, implying terminal rate of 3.25%, substantially above the pre-pandemic 1.75-2.00% neutral rate assumption, meaning monetary policy remains restrictive even after recent easing. This persistent tightness should moderate 2026 growth to 2.0-2.2% from 2025’s elevated pace, though inflation resurgence risks could force rate reversals that intensify restraint. Paradoxically, financial markets ignore monetary restriction: equity valuations reached historically elevated levels, credit spreads remain compressed, and corporate bond issuance surged, suggesting either markets expect rapid Fed easing beyond current projections or substantial mispricing of recession risks. [2] [39] [40]
Current Driver 4: Fiscal Expansion Dynamics and Election-Year Stimulus
Fiscal policy shifted toward substantial expansion in 2025-2026 after previous deficit reduction attempts, injecting demand stimulus that partially offsets monetary tightness but raises serious medium-term sustainability concerns. The federal budget deficit fell to $1.67 trillion in calendar 2025 from $1.87 trillion in 2024, driven entirely by $185 billion tariff revenue surge; excluding this temporary customs windfall, the underlying deficit deteriorated $118 billion. The deficit-to-GDP ratio reached 5.9% in fiscal 2025 by official accounting, though adjusting for student loan accounting changes reveals the actual ratio exceeded 6.3%—substantially above the 3.5% historical average and unsustainable long-term trajectory. Federal debt reached 125% of GDP, up from 124.3% in 2024, with interest payments totaling $1.06 trillion, consuming 15% of federal revenue and rising toward 20% by 2028 on current path. 2026 presents election-year fiscal dynamics that consistently bias toward expansion regardless of sustainability concerns. The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” passed in July 2025 extended Trump-era tax cuts at estimated 10-year cost of $3.4 trillion, while new spending proposals under consideration include $30 billion annually in enhanced ACA subsidies, $300-600 billion in tariff “dividend” checks to lower-income households, and expanded defense procurement. These measures, combined with reduced IRS funding that lowers tax collection by estimated $50 billion annually, could push the 2026 deficit to 7.0-7.5% of GDP—a level historically associated with wartime mobilization or severe recessions, not late-cycle expansions. The economic effect is unambiguously stimulative near-term: fiscal expansion adds 0.5-0.7 percentage points to 2026 GDP as government purchases increase and tax cuts boost disposable income. However, medium-term consequences loom ominously: rising interest rates required to finance deficits crowd out private investment; accelerating interest payments compound deficit dynamics; and eventual fiscal consolidation—whether through spending cuts or tax increases—will subtract 1.5-2.0 percentage points from GDP when implemented. The Congressional Budget Office projects debt reaching 180% of GDP by 2050 on current policy trajectory, a level that triggers sovereign debt concerns and potentially forces crisis-driven fiscal adjustment far more disruptive than gradual consolidation. [39] [4] [46] [5] [47] [6] [48] [43]
Emerging Dynamic 1: Productivity Acceleration Sustainability Questions
The extraordinary 4.9% productivity growth recorded in Q3 2025—and 4.1% in Q2—raises the pivotal question of whether AI investments are generating genuine economy-wide efficiency gains or temporary measurement artifacts and sector-specific improvements with limited spillover. If sustained, 3-4% productivity growth transforms economic constraints: potential GDP rises from 1.8% to 2.8-3.2%, enabling faster expansion without inflation pressures as output per worker increases; real wage growth accelerates without squeezing profit margins; and federal debt ratios stabilize as denominator growth outpaces numerator accumulation. Historical precedent from 1995-2004’s internet productivity boom shows 2.5% sustained productivity gains enabled 3.5% GDP growth with 2% inflation, validating optimistic scenarios. However, skepticism is warranted: Q3’s 4.9% surge follows Q1’s -1.8% decline, suggesting volatility rather than trend shift; productivity gains concentrated in narrow sectors (technology, professional services) rather than broad-based; and unit labor cost declines of -1.9% may reflect cyclical labor hoarding and profit margin manipulation rather than technological efficiency. Manufacturing productivity rose just 1.5% year-over-year despite supposed AI transformation, while service sector gains concentrate in already-efficient digital industries. Most critically, historical productivity accelerations prove difficult to sustain beyond 2-3 quarter intervals, typically reverting toward 1.2-1.5% trend rates. The coming 2-3 quarters will prove decisive: if productivity holds above 3% through mid-2026, validating AI investment thesis, growth potential expands materially; if productivity reverts toward 1.5%, current GDP strength reflects unsustainable inventory and trade timing effects rather than fundamental capacity enhancement. [49] [22]
Emerging Dynamic 2: Immigration Policy and Labor Supply Constraints
Immigration restriction implemented through 2025 substantially tightened labor supply conditions, lowering the breakeven employment level from 150,000 monthly job additions in early 2024 to below 90,000 by mid-2025—a structural shift with profound implications for inflation dynamics and growth potential. Net migration fell from 2.4 million in 2024 to an estimated 900,000 in 2025 following policy changes including work permit restrictions, deportation acceleration, and border enforcement intensification. This 1.5 million annual reduction in labor force growth directly constrained potential GDP by approximately 0.5 percentage points: with 63% labor force participation, 1.5 million fewer migrants translates to 950,000 fewer workers and $80 billion less potential output at $84,000 average productivity. More insidiously, reduced labor supply resurrects wage-price spiral risks. With breakeven employment at 90,000 monthly, the December payroll gain of 50,000—seemingly weak—actually tightens labor markets, putting upward pressure on wages that averaged 3.8% growth in December, above the 3.0-3.2% rate consistent with 2% inflation and 1.5% productivity. If productivity reverts toward trend, wage pressures intensify further, potentially pushing inflation back above 4% by Q4 2026 despite current 2.7% reading. Federal Reserve analysis shows immigration reduction explains 60% of recent labor force participation shortfalls and suggests persistent tightness will force either higher interest rates (subtracting 0.3-0.5 percentage points from GDP) or acceptance of elevated inflation (eroding real incomes and consumer purchasing power). Politically, immigration restriction proves popular; economically, it constrains growth potential and reignites inflation risks precisely when labor-intensive sectors (healthcare, food service, construction) face acute worker shortages. Partial policy reversal appears unlikely given electoral dynamics, meaning these constraints persist through 2027-2028, lowering potential growth estimates and raising natural unemployment rate from 4.0% to 4.3-4.5%. [16] [21] [6]
Emerging Dynamic 3: Debt Sustainability Pressures and Fiscal Constraints
Federal debt dynamics pose the economy’s gravest long-term threat, constraining future policy flexibility and raising potential crisis risks that could dwarf cyclical recession concerns. Gross federal debt reached $38.5 trillion (125% of GDP) in December 2025, up from 100% in 2019, with debt-to-GDP projected to reach 130% by 2028 and 180% by 2050 on current trajectory—levels historically associated with sovereign debt crises in advanced economies. Annual interest payments totaled $1.06 trillion in 2025, consuming 15% of federal revenue, and are projected to reach $1.5 trillion (20% of revenue) by 2028 and $2.5 trillion (27% of revenue) by 2034 assuming interest rates average 3.8%—a rosy assumption given current 10-year Treasury yields of 4.26%. This debt accumulation operates through multiple destructive channels. Rising government borrowing pushes up interest rates 25-50 basis points above levels justified by inflation and growth fundamentals, crowding out private investment in productive capital, housing, and business expansion that generates future income growth. Each percentage point of additional debt-to-GDP reduces long-run GDP by 0.15-0.20 percentage points through this crowding-out mechanism, suggesting current debt path subtracts 0.5-0.7 percentage points from 2027-2030 potential growth. Accelerating interest payments create vicious debt dynamics: as interest costs rise, deficits widen further, requiring additional borrowing at higher rates, compounding interest obligations in self-reinforcing spiral. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that without policy changes, interest payments will exceed defense spending by 2028, Medicare spending by 2032, and Social Security spending by 2036, consuming progressively larger revenue shares and forcing either tax increases that depress economic activity or spending cuts that reduce productive government investment in infrastructure, education, and research. Most ominously, elevated debt eliminates fiscal space to respond to future crises: the 2020 pandemic response required $5 trillion borrowing (23% of GDP) to prevent depression; replicating this response from 125% debt baseline would push debt above 150% of GDP, approaching levels that trigger sovereign debt concerns, capital flight, and potential fiscal crisis requiring IMF-style consolidation programs. Addressing this trajectory requires either substantial tax increases (2-3% of GDP), entitlement reforms reducing Social Security and Medicare growth, or preferably productivity acceleration that enables denominator growth outpacing numerator accumulation—the only painless solution but also the least certain. [33] [4] [50] [48]
Scenario Analysis: Alternative Trajectories
Three scenarios encompass plausible 2026-2027 outcomes with differing probability weights.
The baseline scenario (60% probability) assumes Supreme Court upholds tariff authority, Federal Reserve cuts 50 basis points total in 2026 to 3.25%, fiscal deficit reaches 6.5% of GDP, productivity moderates to 2.5%, and growth decelerates to 2.1% in 2026 and 1.9% in 2027 with inflation stabilizing at 2.5%—weak but positive expansion enabling soft landing. This scenario requires multiple favorable conditions aligning: no major external shocks, productivity sustaining modestly above trend, monetary-fiscal policy coordination avoiding extremes, and Supreme Court validation of tariff regime.
An upside scenario (20% probability) envisions productivity acceleration proving sustainable at 3.5%+ driven by AI adoption demonstrating measurable economy-wide efficiency gains, validating investment thesis and enabling 2.8% growth in 2026 and 2.6% in 2027 with inflation falling to 2.0% through supply expansion. This scenario requires evidence of AI productivity impacts beyond technology sector appearing by Q2 2026, Federal Reserve maintaining accommodative stance with additional 75 basis points of cuts, and no Supreme Court tariff invalidation disrupting trade flows. The trigger: manufacturing productivity growth sustaining above 2.5% for three consecutive quarters and unit labor costs remaining negative, validating that technology adoption is genuinely transforming production functions.
A downside scenario (20% probability) features Supreme Court invalidating IEEPA tariffs, forcing $185 billion revenue loss and $600 billion fiscal adjustment, while inflation resurges above 4% from lagged tariff pass-through and fiscal expansion, compelling Federal Reserve to reverse course and raise rates 75 basis points back toward 4.25%, with productivity reverting to 1.2% trend. Growth could slow to 0.8% in 2026 with recession risk elevated at 40% as multiple headwinds converge: trade deficit widening subtracts 1.2 percentage points as imports surge following tariff removal, consumption contracts 0.5 percentage points as real wages decline amid inflation acceleration, investment falls 0.3 percentage points as interest rates rise, and confidence effects amplify through negative feedback loops. Early warning signals include: Supreme Court oral arguments in March 2026 indicating skepticism of IEEPA authority; inflation readings above 3.0% in February-March despite seasonal adjustments; productivity data for Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 showing reversion toward 1.5%; and manufacturing PMI falling below 48, indicating accelerating contraction. [5] [22] [6] [7] [43]
Outlook & Strategic Implications
Directional Call and Timeline
The United States economy will experience pronounced moderation through Q2 2026 as temporary growth tailwinds dissipate, followed by stabilization in the second half at below-trend but positive expansion rates, positioning 2026 as a transition year from late-cycle exuberance to mid-cycle equilibrium rather than recession. Growth will decelerate from Q4 2025’s extraordinary 4.3% pace to 2.2% in Q1 2026, 2.0% in Q2, before stabilizing at 2.1-2.2% in H2, yielding full-year 2026 expansion of 2.1%—midpoint of the 1.5% (OECD pessimistic) to 2.4% (IMF optimistic) forecast range and representing the economy’s third consecutive year above 2.0%. This deceleration reflects multiple forces: net export contribution reverses from +1.9 to -0.7 percentage points as tariff-distorted trade flows normalize; consumption contribution moderates from 1.7 to 1.4 percentage points as real wage growth slows and sentiment effects constrain spending; business investment maintains 1.0 point contribution but shifts from equipment front-loading toward software and structures; government spending adds 0.5 points through election-year fiscal expansion but faces constraints from Supreme Court review and deficit concerns. Risks tilt modestly to the downside (55% probability of below-baseline outcome): Supreme Court tariff invalidation, inflation resurgence above 4%, or productivity reversion toward 1.2% trend could lower 2026 growth to 1.3-1.5% with recession probability rising to 30%; conversely, sustained productivity above 3.0% and Federal Reserve accommodation could lift growth toward 2.6-2.8% with recession risk below 10%. A decisive turning point is unlikely before Q3 2026, when sufficient monetary easing will have transmitted through the economy, fiscal clarity emerges post-election, and productivity sustainability becomes empirically evident through three quarters of consistent data. Full-year 2026 growth of 2.1% represents the midpoint of likely outcomes, positioning the United States for continued expansion but at decelerating rates requiring policy vigilance to prevent tipping into contraction. [3] [7] [8]
Policy Implications
The Federal Reserve should proceed with measured rate cuts—25 basis points per quarter through Q3 2026, bringing rates to 3.00% by September—unless inflation unexpectedly reaccelerates above 3.5%, which would necessitate pause or modest reversal. More aggressive easing risks reigniting inflation before disinflation completes the journey to 2.0% target, particularly given labor supply constraints and fiscal expansion; conversely, maintaining current 3.50-3.75% rates through 2026 would overtighten given productivity gains and risks pushing unemployment toward 5.0%, triggering recession. The Fed faces profound challenges: inflation persistence at 2.7-2.8% suggests premature easing risks, yet labor market gradual loosening argues for continued accommodation; financial conditions remain loose despite policy rates, yet credit availability tightened substantially; productivity surge could ease inflation constraints, yet sustainability remains unproven. Optimal policy navigates this complexity through state-contingent guidance: cut rates if unemployment rises above 4.7% or inflation falls below 2.3%, pause if inflation exceeds 3.2% or productivity falls below 1.8%, and reverse if inflation rises above 4.0% regardless of unemployment. The December 2025 “dot plot” projecting only one additional cut appears too hawkish given baseline growth deceleration, though three consecutive dissents at December FOMC meeting reveal internal disagreement about appropriate policy stance, with some members favoring immediate pause and others advocating 50-basis-point cuts. [39] [19]
Fiscally, the United States faces its gravest challenge: deficits approaching 7% of GDP during economic expansion represent catastrophic policy failure, requiring immediate consolidation even knowing election-year political economy makes action nearly impossible. The optimal path—gradual deficit reduction toward 3.5% of GDP through 2027-2029 via combination of tax increases (1.5% of GDP), entitlement reforms (1.0% of GDP), and discretionary spending constraints (1.0% of GDP)—appears politically infeasible given both parties’ campaign commitments. Election-year fiscal expansion through tariff dividend checks, ACA subsidy extensions, and defense spending increases will likely push 2026 deficit to 7.0-7.5%, forcing crisis-driven adjustment in 2027-2028 that proves far more economically disruptive than gradual consolidation. The Supreme Court’s tariff ruling compounds fiscal challenges: invalidation eliminates $185 billion annual revenue, requiring $600 billion compensating adjustments; validation sustains revenue but at cost of higher consumer prices, reduced trade, and retaliatory barriers. Structural reforms addressing long-term entitlement trajectories—raising Social Security full retirement age to 69 by 2035, means-testing Medicare benefits above $150,000 income, and indexing benefits to CPI rather than wage growth—would reduce 2050 debt projections by 30 percentage points of GDP but require bipartisan consensus impossible to achieve in current polarized environment. The realistic assessment: fiscal policy will worsen before improving, with 2026-2027 expansion followed by inevitable 2028-2029 consolidation that subtracts 1.5-2.0 percentage points from growth and likely triggers recession absent offsetting monetary accommodation. [5] [48] [43]
Business and Investment Considerations
Corporate strategists should emphasize operational efficiency, margin expansion, and productivity investment over aggressive capacity expansion given subdued growth outlook and elevated uncertainty. Interest-sensitive sectors—residential construction, commercial real estate, consumer durables—face continued headwinds until rates decline materially below 3.5%, with housing market recovery unlikely before late 2026 as mortgage rates remain 175+ basis points above levels consistent with historical transaction volumes. Export-oriented manufacturers benefit from dollar weakness (despite recent strength) and should accelerate diversification away from China toward Mexico, Vietnam, and India to mitigate tariff risks, while import-dependent sectors must absorb 8-12% cost increases from sustained duties and reconfigure supply chains accepting higher structural costs. Technology sector strength continues through 2026-2027 as AI investment maintains momentum, with semiconductor, data center, cloud infrastructure, and enterprise software subsegments offering most attractive growth opportunities; however, valuations reached elevated levels requiring 15%+ earnings growth to justify, creating downside risk if productivity benefits disappoint or investment pace slows. [32] [11]
For investors, U.S. equities appear fairly valued assuming baseline scenario, with S&P 500 forward P/E of 21x requiring 12-13% earnings growth that depends on productivity sustaining above 2.5% and profit margins remaining elevated—conditions with 60% probability but far from certain. Defensive sectors—utilities, consumer staples, healthcare—should outperform cyclicals through mid-2026 as growth decelerates, before late-year rotation toward industrials, financials, and materials as stabilization emerges and positioning anticipates 2027 reacceleration. Fixed income offers compelling risk-adjusted returns with 10-year Treasury yields at 4.26%, 225 basis points above expected 2.0% inflation, providing 2.26% real returns substantially above historical 1.0% averages. Duration positioning should favor 5-7 year maturity range, balancing yield capture against reinvestment risk if Fed easing proves more aggressive than baseline projects. Corporate investment-grade credit spreads at 95 basis points above Treasuries appear reasonably valued, while high-yield spreads at 325 basis points suggest modest room for tightening if recession is avoided; however, spread compression opportunities appear limited absent sustained growth acceleration or Fed easing beyond current pricing. International diversification remains essential: European equities trade at 30% discount to U.S. multiples despite comparable earnings growth prospects, emerging market debt offers 5.5-6.5% yields with manageable default risks, and Asian equity markets benefit from AI supply chain positioning without U.S. valuation premiums. The overarching investment theme: calibrated exposure favoring quality over speculation, income over capital appreciation, and diversification over concentration, reflecting late-cycle dynamics where return optimization requires risk management rather than aggressive beta capture. [33] [34] [32]
⁂ Sources :
- https://www.investing.com/analysis/us-growth-looks-supercharged-as-q4-gdp-nowcast-jumps-above-5-200673077
- https://www.babypips.com/trading/explainer-q4-2025-us-gdp-prediction-market-expectations-2026-01-14
- https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth
- https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/government-debt-to-gdp
- https://www.ttnews.com/articles/budget-deficit-shrinks-2025
- https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2026/risk-higher-us-inflation-2026
- https://www.reuters.com/business/imf-sees-steady-global-growth-2026-ai-boom-offsets-trade-headwinds-2026-01-19/
- https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2025/09/oecd-economic-outlook-interim-report-september-2025_ae3d418b.html
- https://azfreenews.com/2026/01/december-retail-sales-jump-as-2025-holiday-spending-hits-near-record-levels/
- https://rapaport.com/news/us-retail-sales-see-holiday-spike-in-december/
- https://bankingjournal.aba.com/2025/01/housing-starts-increased-in-december-2/
- https://www.finanznachrichten.de/nachrichten-2025-01/64320384-u-s-housing-starts-spike-much-more-than-expected-in-december-020.htm
- https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_industrial_production_index_unadjusted
- https://www.msci.org/u-s-industrial-production-increased-at-end-of-2025/
- https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/industrial-production-mom
- https://bilello.blog/2026/the-week-in-charts-1-21-26
- https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2026/01/13/annual-inflation-cpi-december-report/88133586007/
- https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/13/economy/us-cpi-consumer-prices-inflation-december
- https://www.petiole.com/de/insights/articles/fed-january-2026-decision-rate-cuts-economic-uncertainty
- https://www.hiringlab.org/2025/07/24/july-labor-market-update-wage-growth-outpacing-inflation/
- https://usafacts.org/answers/are-wages-keeping-up-with-inflation/country/united-states/
- https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2013378183069044954
- https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bank-america-resets-jobs-forecast-150300211.html
- https://www.actalentservices.com/en/insights/market-intelligence/actalents-us-labor-market-and-economy-report-december-2025
- https://www.compositepanel.org/december-u-s-consumer-confidence-shrinks/
- https://www.compositepanel.org/u-s-manufacturing-index-strong-in-december/
- https://www.reuters.com/business/us-consumer-confidence-deteriorates-december-2025-12-23/
- https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-news-and-reports/reports/ism-pmi-reports/pmi/december/
- https://english.news.cn/20251224/ae8f0f1d099b49919a9c71e7020330b1/c.html
- https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyd8r1xgjko
- https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jones/202601218124/10-year-treasury-yield-falls-to-4252-data-talk
- https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/the-sp-500-expected-to-rally-12-this-year
- https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/government-bond-yield
- https://www.rbcwealthmanagement.com/en-us/insights/us-equity-returns-in-2025-record-breaking-resilience
- https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
- https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/capacity-utilization/news/517770
- https://www.fx.co/en/forex-news/2869903
- https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/T10Y2Y
- https://rsmus.com/insights/economics/another-fed-rate-cut-january.html
- https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/economy/us-economic-forecast/united-states-outlook-analysis.html
- https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/balance-of-trade
- https://prosperousamerica.org/october-trade-deficit-falls-39-lowest-in-years-but-u-s-will-still-surpass-1-trillion-goods-gap-in-2025/
- https://www.finregrag.com/p/us-economic-outlook-for-2026-a-positive
- https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/current-account
- https://www.bea.gov/news/2026/us-international-transactions-3rd-quarter-2025
- https://fortune.com/2026/01/21/federal-debt-per-household-borrowing-crisis/
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-13/us-deficit-shrank-to-1-7-trillion-in-2025-thanks-to-tariff-jump
- https://www.brookings.edu/articles/economic-issues-to-watch-in-2026/
- https://lab.productivity.ac.uk/insights/q2-2025-us-productivity-growth-rebounds-in-2025-second-quarter-smoothing-first-quarter-manufacturing-and-trade-distortions/
- https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/united-states/government-debt–of-nominal-gdp
- https://www.shs-conferences.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522501012
- https://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/4506
- https://al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jmss/article/view/8762
- https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11253173/
- https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11213817/
- https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00521-025-11468-z
- http://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/30639/1/US Forec New_revised2.pdf
- https://armgpublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/FMIR_4_2023_10.pdf
- Economic-Country-Report-Template_-Implementation.docx
- https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/publications/labour-market-outlook-q4-2025/
- https://www.vidhyayanaejournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/2367
- https://hdl.handle.net/10986/44134
- http://www.scienceij.com/index.php/sij/article/view/187
- https://contemppediatrdent.org/editorial-five-years-of-growth-a-new-era-for-contemporary-pediatric-dentistry/
- https://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/en/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Adrian-NEGREA-Adriana-GIURGIU-Ciprian-Beniamin-BENEA.pdf
- https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/tpref/article/view/9250
- https://sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJAES/article/view/33501
- https://repositorio.banrep.gov.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12134/11263/inf-jun-dir-con-rep-eng.07-2025.pdf
- https://economyandsociety.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/6247
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/D3BF64E0FF41D4B8C31E35798B4168BF/S0027950122000175a.pdf/div-class-title-global-economic-outlook-inflation-prompts-policy-normalisation-div.pdf
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.07992.pdf
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.08304.pdf
- https://arxiv.org/html/2501.04607v1
- https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/5pkkan15/download/pdf
- https://arxiv.org/html/2111.00822v3
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.03897.pdf
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.05805.pdf
- https://translate.google.com/?hl=de&langpair=en|de
- https://www.state.gov/global-community-liaison-office/family-member-employment/overseas-family-member-employment/pdf-application-form-instructions
- https://www.dlapiperdataprotection.com/?c=US
- https://academic.oup.com/mnras/pages/general_instructions
- https://pctlegal.wipo.int/eGuide/view-doc.xhtml?doc-code=pctip&doc-lang=en&doc-type=guide
- https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/sp800-63b.html
- https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf
- https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/177865aad8a6e7b15dc8524c85f54f49b90c9dcc
- https://www.deanfrancispress.com/index.php/fe/article/view/1084
- https://www.ewadirect.com/proceedings/aemps/article/view/30550
- https://www.ewadirect.com/proceedings/aemps/article/view/22484
- https://lseee.net/index.php/fe/article/view/789
- https://www.ewadirect.com/journal/jaeps/article/view/27330
- https://www.deanfrancispress.com/index.php/fe/article/view/1035
- http://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.27-10-2023.2342013
- https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7242595e75550a1d87f9112cd6a6604e6271f53
- https://www.ewadirect.com/proceedings/aemps/article/view/8229
- https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304393215000410
- https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Nonlinearities_Smoothing_and_countercyclical_Monetary_Policy/6712361/files/12243812.pdf
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7779901/
- http://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.04308.pdf
- https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Federal_Reserve_Credibility_and_the_Term_Structure_of_Interest_Rates/6712310/1/files/12243767.pdf
- http://arxiv.org/pdf/2202.00929.pdf
- https://aemps.ewapublishing.org/media/f9540d94a8434656b44e9ec6a2db2a2a.marked_PabkzE7.pdf
- https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.08631.pdf
- https://tfoco.com/en/insights/articles/fed-january-2026-rate-cuts-economic-uncertainty
- https://www.emerald.com/jdqs/article/33/4/313/1304511/Commodity-spot-prices-and-the-US-stock-market
- https://hbem.org/index.php/OJS/article/view/537
- https://www.mdpi.com/2674-1032/4/4/57
- https://www.ewadirect.com/proceedings/aemps/article/view/25109
